Tuesday, 18 December 2007
Why the Hell Should I Like Muslims?
Just before Christmas, the lazy fat cats at Channel 4 produce "Make Me a Muslim" in their sycophantic attempts to suck up to these illegal immigrants. The Muslims push and shout, and this appeasing society gives way. WHY? Just gone soft. No such problem with Islam---they will push and push until they push this soft liberal society over the cliff--and in the language of the "survival of the fittest" the losers will have deserved it.
From the Dictatorship of the Proletariat to the Dictatorship of the KGB
Just a thought for Christmas from my carer.
Wishful selling:—
Молодежное демократическое антифашистское движение «Наши»
Whereas reality is:—
Молодежное антидемократическое фашистское движение «Наши»
Putinjugend— Hitlerjugend—Putin Youth—Hitler Youth—spot the difference
Thus as Russia alienates itself from any possible democracy for the foreseeable future, corruption embeds itself within this society. Why oh why have the Russians deserved such poor leadership—why do they put up with these petty dictators. The Ukraine rebelled when the Russian immigrant attempted to fraudulently fix their elections, and the Orange Revolution flowered, yet the Russians suffer their own fools gladly. Hundreds of years of a serf mentality, followed by seventy years of communist brainwashing has eroded their self respect as human beings. Now with this Belarus “anschluss” the Russians expand their travesty to another ten million gormless acolytes of “How not to Rule” in the 21st Century. Putin rattles his marbles in an artificial attempt to stir up Russian nationalism, making the West cringe in mock despair at his antics, and all the relaxed expectations following the Cold War go out of the window. Come on Russia—kick Putin and his KGB stooges back into the sewers where they came from.
Wishful selling:—
Молодежное демократическое антифашистское движение «Наши»
Whereas reality is:—
Молодежное антидемократическое фашистское движение «Наши»
Putinjugend— Hitlerjugend—Putin Youth—Hitler Youth—spot the difference
Thus as Russia alienates itself from any possible democracy for the foreseeable future, corruption embeds itself within this society. Why oh why have the Russians deserved such poor leadership—why do they put up with these petty dictators. The Ukraine rebelled when the Russian immigrant attempted to fraudulently fix their elections, and the Orange Revolution flowered, yet the Russians suffer their own fools gladly. Hundreds of years of a serf mentality, followed by seventy years of communist brainwashing has eroded their self respect as human beings. Now with this Belarus “anschluss” the Russians expand their travesty to another ten million gormless acolytes of “How not to Rule” in the 21st Century. Putin rattles his marbles in an artificial attempt to stir up Russian nationalism, making the West cringe in mock despair at his antics, and all the relaxed expectations following the Cold War go out of the window. Come on Russia—kick Putin and his KGB stooges back into the sewers where they came from.
Labels:
Putin’s Nashi Thugs
Saturday, 15 December 2007
Over 11,000 Illegal Immigrants Working in the UK SECURITY INDUSTRY
My poor carer slammed his fist down and then rushed to the computer and penned this.
I’m of the opinion that this abysmal incompetent government is not fit for purpose. We have had over 2,000 serious foreign criminals, who should have been deported, let out of prison into the community. We have over 11,000 illegal immigrants working in the SECURITY INDUSTRY. We have over a million illegal immigrants embedded in our society, taking up housing, using social services, abusing our medical facilities. These are the people who have NO RIGHT to be here. Worse, they are also vocal in DEMANDING they be allowed to stay. How on earth did a British Government end up so incompetent? The answer is simple: they adhered to DOGMA rather than sense. Political Correctness, Human Rights, Asylum Law, and all sorts of other liberal idiocy have taken precedence over the welfare of the rights of the ordinary taxpayer. Shame on such maladministration and dysfunctionality.
I’m of the opinion that this abysmal incompetent government is not fit for purpose. We have had over 2,000 serious foreign criminals, who should have been deported, let out of prison into the community. We have over 11,000 illegal immigrants working in the SECURITY INDUSTRY. We have over a million illegal immigrants embedded in our society, taking up housing, using social services, abusing our medical facilities. These are the people who have NO RIGHT to be here. Worse, they are also vocal in DEMANDING they be allowed to stay. How on earth did a British Government end up so incompetent? The answer is simple: they adhered to DOGMA rather than sense. Political Correctness, Human Rights, Asylum Law, and all sorts of other liberal idiocy have taken precedence over the welfare of the rights of the ordinary taxpayer. Shame on such maladministration and dysfunctionality.
Sunday, 2 December 2007
MUSLIMS WANT TO BAN CHRISTMAS—SHOULD WE LET THEM?
A Christmas message from my carer.
Can you imagine a Christian in a Muslim country complaining about a Muslim festival he/she has to put up with—the Muslim authorities would either put him/her in jail or worse, give them 40 lashes. So why do we put up with Muslim gripes about Christmas? Christmas is being downgraded or even quietly ignored in many schools as a policy of appeasement and Political Correctness. WHY DO WE PUT UP WITH IT? Can someone tell me?Why has Britain become so WET, so sickeningly SOFT that they blame themselves instead of others? Why has Britain lost its guts, its spunk, its manhood? Has it anything to do with GETTIING IN TOUCH WITH YOUR FEMENINE SIDE? The Government will legislate against racism, sexism, homophobia, ageism, but not against an infiltrating invasion of Muslims who are out to put their filthy green flag over Dawning Street.
You gets what you deserve. Not prepared to stand up—THEN GET SWAMPED!
Can you imagine a Christian in a Muslim country complaining about a Muslim festival he/she has to put up with—the Muslim authorities would either put him/her in jail or worse, give them 40 lashes. So why do we put up with Muslim gripes about Christmas? Christmas is being downgraded or even quietly ignored in many schools as a policy of appeasement and Political Correctness. WHY DO WE PUT UP WITH IT? Can someone tell me?Why has Britain become so WET, so sickeningly SOFT that they blame themselves instead of others? Why has Britain lost its guts, its spunk, its manhood? Has it anything to do with GETTIING IN TOUCH WITH YOUR FEMENINE SIDE? The Government will legislate against racism, sexism, homophobia, ageism, but not against an infiltrating invasion of Muslims who are out to put their filthy green flag over Dawning Street.
You gets what you deserve. Not prepared to stand up—THEN GET SWAMPED!
Labels:
Survival of the Fittest
Wednesday, 28 November 2007
Supposed Arab Land
Those loony Arabs keep drivelling on and shouting about Arab land in Morocco, in Iraq, in Palestine, even in Darfur. The only true Arab lands are that of Saudi Arabia, the Gulf and Yemen. The rest are conquered lands—and what’s been conquered can be unconquered.Arabs grabbed land from the Coptic Egyptians, from the Iraqi and Syrian Assyrians, from the North African Berbers. Now they claim its Arab lands. NO IT ISN’T. Sod the Palestinians and Hezbollah Shia land—the Jew have more right to be there than the Palestinians—and sod the Arab claims to any land at all.
Labels:
Sod the Arabs
Turkey in the EU—Most definitely NOT!
More flamable thoughts from my carer.
Europe having borders with Iraq? With Syria? With Iran? Are you out of your bloody British Labour minds. Both Blair and gormless Gordon. How stupid can you get when you insist Asia Minor becomes part of the European Union. Letting Cyprus join was down to the Greeks there, not the Turks—and is the ONLY exception I would allow, otherwise where does it stop? Do we invite Japan to join—maybe China?.Turkey is not European by culture, by religion, by language, by custom and by any other criteria one cares to mention. It is Asian! So what qualifies Turkey to join the EU—because Britain and the US want it to—NOT ENOUGH. If NATO’s efforts are taken in to account in Afghanistan, then NATO is useless and that’s one reason why the US wants Turkey in the EU. The only reason Britain wants Turkey in the EU is to weaken the EU—and that is the truth. Britain virulently objects to the Paris-Berlin axis and wants to use Turkey to weaken and destroy it. Selfish Blair and Labour want to be the prima donnas in Europe. De Gaulle was right to distrust Britain’s entry into the EU.
Europe united in a strong Federal States of Europe—not divided by Britain insisting on Turkey’s entry. I’d rather have Britain kicked OUT of the EU than allow Turkey in. We have loony Putin’s Russia to the east and the psychotic Muslims to the south—and for that we do need a STRONG UNITED EUROPE.
Europe having borders with Iraq? With Syria? With Iran? Are you out of your bloody British Labour minds. Both Blair and gormless Gordon. How stupid can you get when you insist Asia Minor becomes part of the European Union. Letting Cyprus join was down to the Greeks there, not the Turks—and is the ONLY exception I would allow, otherwise where does it stop? Do we invite Japan to join—maybe China?.Turkey is not European by culture, by religion, by language, by custom and by any other criteria one cares to mention. It is Asian! So what qualifies Turkey to join the EU—because Britain and the US want it to—NOT ENOUGH. If NATO’s efforts are taken in to account in Afghanistan, then NATO is useless and that’s one reason why the US wants Turkey in the EU. The only reason Britain wants Turkey in the EU is to weaken the EU—and that is the truth. Britain virulently objects to the Paris-Berlin axis and wants to use Turkey to weaken and destroy it. Selfish Blair and Labour want to be the prima donnas in Europe. De Gaulle was right to distrust Britain’s entry into the EU.
Europe united in a strong Federal States of Europe—not divided by Britain insisting on Turkey’s entry. I’d rather have Britain kicked OUT of the EU than allow Turkey in. We have loony Putin’s Russia to the east and the psychotic Muslims to the south—and for that we do need a STRONG UNITED EUROPE.
Labels:
A STRONG UNITED EUROPE
Saturday, 24 November 2007
Taliban is mainly self-funding through opium poppies turned into heroin. Destroy the opium crop—destroy the Taliban.
More from my carer.
I’ve discovered from the Senlis Report that the western troops in Afghanistan are wasting their time. Not only are the Taliban creeping back, but our troops are dying for nothing—in fact over who controls the drug trade.
“Everyone in the Government is corrupt,” said a high-up Kabul source who feared for his life. The fight in Helmand province is all about who controls the drugs, Kabul or the Taliban. Western advisors are also disgusted at how narco-kleptocracy has extended its grip around President Karzai, a figure regarded by some as increasingly isolated by a cadre of corrupt officials—now fed false and distorted advise by corrupt officials. Instead of fighting to assert Western values, our soldiers are dying to protect the poppy trade for Kabul so they don’t go to the Taliban. DESTROY THE POPPY FIELDS AND YOU DESTROY THE TALIBAN. How stupid can NATO be. Has everyone gone simple minded?
I’ve discovered from the Senlis Report that the western troops in Afghanistan are wasting their time. Not only are the Taliban creeping back, but our troops are dying for nothing—in fact over who controls the drug trade.
“Everyone in the Government is corrupt,” said a high-up Kabul source who feared for his life. The fight in Helmand province is all about who controls the drugs, Kabul or the Taliban. Western advisors are also disgusted at how narco-kleptocracy has extended its grip around President Karzai, a figure regarded by some as increasingly isolated by a cadre of corrupt officials—now fed false and distorted advise by corrupt officials. Instead of fighting to assert Western values, our soldiers are dying to protect the poppy trade for Kabul so they don’t go to the Taliban. DESTROY THE POPPY FIELDS AND YOU DESTROY THE TALIBAN. How stupid can NATO be. Has everyone gone simple minded?
Labels:
Reluctant NATO
Thursday, 22 November 2007
Wake up Europe
This is my carer being angry.
A full scale invasion is in progress by Islam. Weapons being used are:—illegal entry—asylum seeking—human rights—Political Correctness—Liberty—liberal leftwing values—Trotskyism.
We now consider North Africa as Arab—but that was not always the case. It is now Arab due to their invasions in the 7th and 8th centuries. The indigenous inhabitants were overwhelmed by the sword. Following the Muslim-Arab conquest in the 7th century AD, the entire Middle East underwent a process of Arabization and Islamization that eradicated the indigenous cultures. Prior to the Arab invasion, the Middle East was rich with Berber peoples, Vandals, Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Egyptian Copts, Nubians, and Ethiopians.
The Arabs come from Arabia, not Iraq (Old Persian-Iranian–Greek), Syria (Assyria), Egypt (Copt), Tunisia (Berber), Algeria (Berber), or Morocco (Berber). Other pre-Arab peoples in the Middle East such as the Berbers, Copts, Jews, and Maronites have been swamped by Arabs and their malevolent Islamic culture. All these other countries were invaded and now the Arabs are dominant there. This scenario is waiting for us in Britain and Europe—the Arabs have scheduled it. The Gulf States, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia are legitimate Arab states—the other ones are Arab due to invasion. Not a pretty story.
The Arabs tried to invade Europe once before but got only as far as Tours in France before being beaten by Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours on October 10th, 732, and finally driven out of Europe in 1492. This second invasion will need Europe to firstly wake up and dump its leftwing dogma, then to deport Muslims en mass from Europe. Its that or go under—the choice is for the people of Europe—leftwing liberal junk followed by Sharia, or kicking the Muslims back to where they came from.
On the current form of wet European thinking, I suggest you learn Arabic.
A full scale invasion is in progress by Islam. Weapons being used are:—illegal entry—asylum seeking—human rights—Political Correctness—Liberty—liberal leftwing values—Trotskyism.
We now consider North Africa as Arab—but that was not always the case. It is now Arab due to their invasions in the 7th and 8th centuries. The indigenous inhabitants were overwhelmed by the sword. Following the Muslim-Arab conquest in the 7th century AD, the entire Middle East underwent a process of Arabization and Islamization that eradicated the indigenous cultures. Prior to the Arab invasion, the Middle East was rich with Berber peoples, Vandals, Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans, Egyptian Copts, Nubians, and Ethiopians.
The Arabs come from Arabia, not Iraq (Old Persian-Iranian–Greek), Syria (Assyria), Egypt (Copt), Tunisia (Berber), Algeria (Berber), or Morocco (Berber). Other pre-Arab peoples in the Middle East such as the Berbers, Copts, Jews, and Maronites have been swamped by Arabs and their malevolent Islamic culture. All these other countries were invaded and now the Arabs are dominant there. This scenario is waiting for us in Britain and Europe—the Arabs have scheduled it. The Gulf States, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia are legitimate Arab states—the other ones are Arab due to invasion. Not a pretty story.
The Arabs tried to invade Europe once before but got only as far as Tours in France before being beaten by Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours on October 10th, 732, and finally driven out of Europe in 1492. This second invasion will need Europe to firstly wake up and dump its leftwing dogma, then to deport Muslims en mass from Europe. Its that or go under—the choice is for the people of Europe—leftwing liberal junk followed by Sharia, or kicking the Muslims back to where they came from.
On the current form of wet European thinking, I suggest you learn Arabic.
Labels:
Vicious Evil Islam
Saturday, 17 November 2007
Let the Shia and Sunni kill each other in the name of Allah.
Abit more from my carer.
The West has parked itself between Shia Iran/Iraq and Sunni Iraqis/Saudi and has to date lost 4,161 coalition deaths in Iraq and some 30,000 wounded—without counting the Iraqi casualties. Shia and Sunni are determined to kill each other, why are we sitting in the middle—and being spat on by both sides. Why is it in our interests to stop them? Let them get on with it! Let them kill each other in the name of Allah!
This is a “Mohammed Cartoon” and as a free cat, I assert my right to publish it.
Bush Jnr. and the neoconservatives in Washington thought they could tame Iraq—well tame it after the Shia/Sunni battle is over.
In the meantime, the West managed to beat the Taliban in 2001 but in 2007 Afghanistan is still producing more poppies than ever. A bumper harvest this year! Is NATO totally useless that it allows this to go on? Destroy the whole bloody crop while you have the chance—and sod the moaning farmers and that useless Karzai. At the moment, it is a half hearted struggle in Afghanistan, much in the manner of Vietnam, and will give the same result. Put some backbone into it.
The final point is, that inasmuch Pakistan is close to civil war, the West needs to napalm Waziristan and help push Pakistan’s military into doing what’s right. There is never going to be the remotest possibility of any democracy in that country and the US should face reality shut up about pushing “democracy” dogma.
The West has parked itself between Shia Iran/Iraq and Sunni Iraqis/Saudi and has to date lost 4,161 coalition deaths in Iraq and some 30,000 wounded—without counting the Iraqi casualties. Shia and Sunni are determined to kill each other, why are we sitting in the middle—and being spat on by both sides. Why is it in our interests to stop them? Let them get on with it! Let them kill each other in the name of Allah!
This is a “Mohammed Cartoon” and as a free cat, I assert my right to publish it.
Bush Jnr. and the neoconservatives in Washington thought they could tame Iraq—well tame it after the Shia/Sunni battle is over.
In the meantime, the West managed to beat the Taliban in 2001 but in 2007 Afghanistan is still producing more poppies than ever. A bumper harvest this year! Is NATO totally useless that it allows this to go on? Destroy the whole bloody crop while you have the chance—and sod the moaning farmers and that useless Karzai. At the moment, it is a half hearted struggle in Afghanistan, much in the manner of Vietnam, and will give the same result. Put some backbone into it.
The final point is, that inasmuch Pakistan is close to civil war, the West needs to napalm Waziristan and help push Pakistan’s military into doing what’s right. There is never going to be the remotest possibility of any democracy in that country and the US should face reality shut up about pushing “democracy” dogma.
Labels:
Muhammad Muttalib. Who Cares?
Friday, 16 November 2007
Thursday, 15 November 2007
Bulimia Arabia
Bloated and obese Qatari Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani wants to buy Sainsbury with our petrodollars so he can practice his binge eating.
Mr Islamic fascist and owner of Al Jazeera—have you NO self control?
Mr Islamic fascist and owner of Al Jazeera—have you NO self control?
Labels:
Our petrodollars
Petrol Engine—a dangerous Dinosaur
Another gem from my carer. You should see the number I've talked him out of.
Not only is the petrol engine polluting but it pours billions of petrodollars into Arab coffers fuelling Muslim fascism. A hundred years ago, most Arabs lived in tents, NOW they want to take over the world—impose sharia on everyone.
Have we in the west gone simple minded with our asinine attachment to this lefty US Political Correctness (PC) dogma?
"Islam will take over Europe without violence within a few decades," oil rich Libya’s Col. Gaddafi said in a speech aired on Al Jazeera. This is a nominally poor country mostly of desert, and this lunatic usurper of power has his eyes firmly fixed on Europe, sending thousands of Muslims across to Lampedusa, situated 205 km from Sicily and 113 km from Tunisia, to invade Europe. All made possible thanks to oil and the West’s gluttony for petrol.
Dubai, another tiny piece of desert with pretensions, spending some $100 billion on home improvements thanks to petrodollars. The good news with Dubai, is that rising waters will swamp all their handiwork and leave the fools that have invested in this duff real estate, underwater.
We badly need to get rid of PC and our dependence on oil. Lazy greedy auto manufacturers, in cahoots with voracious oil companies, are changing the face of Western civilization, and not for the betterment of the indigenous inhabitants.
"We have 50 million Muslims in Europe," Gaddafi told Al Jazeera, “and the 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades."
Not only is the petrol engine polluting but it pours billions of petrodollars into Arab coffers fuelling Muslim fascism. A hundred years ago, most Arabs lived in tents, NOW they want to take over the world—impose sharia on everyone.
Have we in the west gone simple minded with our asinine attachment to this lefty US Political Correctness (PC) dogma?
"Islam will take over Europe without violence within a few decades," oil rich Libya’s Col. Gaddafi said in a speech aired on Al Jazeera. This is a nominally poor country mostly of desert, and this lunatic usurper of power has his eyes firmly fixed on Europe, sending thousands of Muslims across to Lampedusa, situated 205 km from Sicily and 113 km from Tunisia, to invade Europe. All made possible thanks to oil and the West’s gluttony for petrol.
Dubai, another tiny piece of desert with pretensions, spending some $100 billion on home improvements thanks to petrodollars. The good news with Dubai, is that rising waters will swamp all their handiwork and leave the fools that have invested in this duff real estate, underwater.
We badly need to get rid of PC and our dependence on oil. Lazy greedy auto manufacturers, in cahoots with voracious oil companies, are changing the face of Western civilization, and not for the betterment of the indigenous inhabitants.
"We have 50 million Muslims in Europe," Gaddafi told Al Jazeera, “and the 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades."
Labels:
Petrol and Islamic jihadists
Thursday, 8 November 2007
Support Musharaff to the hilt!
More from my carer, bless him.
Bush Jnr. keeps mouthing off on Musharaff—calling for “free” elections—calling for “democracy,” presumably democracy American style, by which he means plutocracy. In a phone call, Bush Jnr. told Gen Musharraf he could not be both army head and President. Is that in America or Pakistan? If Bush Jnr. can’t say anything sensible, then at least he ought to shut up.
Pakistan is on the verge of a civil war with the Sharia louts tearing at its throat in Waziristan and Swat, aided by the suicidal Gul types, even in Islamabad in the Red Mosque—and now the over inflated legal merchants have decided to assert their pathetic power. Has every single screaming lunatic, from Benazir Bhutto to Mohammad Chaudhry and ex-ISI chief Hamid Gul forgotten that Pakistan has nuclear weapons? Imagine a nuclear-armed Somalia or Sudan? Wasn’t the war initiated in Iraq over Saddam’s supposed nuclear weapons?
Thanks to the greedy stupid Canadians, Pakistan now has nuclear weapons, financed by Saudi Arabia—the Sunni bomb—which is why Shia Iran is so desperate to get ITS hands on the “bomb.”
Pakistan isn’t America, isn’t Europe—it’s a backward Muslim country tearing itself apart with the help of their homegrown Taliban. The only person with sense to deal with this dangerous situation, General Pervez Musharraf, ought to be left alone—moreover, supported to the hilt—for all our sakes.
Bush Jnr. keeps mouthing off on Musharaff—calling for “free” elections—calling for “democracy,” presumably democracy American style, by which he means plutocracy. In a phone call, Bush Jnr. told Gen Musharraf he could not be both army head and President. Is that in America or Pakistan? If Bush Jnr. can’t say anything sensible, then at least he ought to shut up.
Pakistan is on the verge of a civil war with the Sharia louts tearing at its throat in Waziristan and Swat, aided by the suicidal Gul types, even in Islamabad in the Red Mosque—and now the over inflated legal merchants have decided to assert their pathetic power. Has every single screaming lunatic, from Benazir Bhutto to Mohammad Chaudhry and ex-ISI chief Hamid Gul forgotten that Pakistan has nuclear weapons? Imagine a nuclear-armed Somalia or Sudan? Wasn’t the war initiated in Iraq over Saddam’s supposed nuclear weapons?
Thanks to the greedy stupid Canadians, Pakistan now has nuclear weapons, financed by Saudi Arabia—the Sunni bomb—which is why Shia Iran is so desperate to get ITS hands on the “bomb.”
Pakistan isn’t America, isn’t Europe—it’s a backward Muslim country tearing itself apart with the help of their homegrown Taliban. The only person with sense to deal with this dangerous situation, General Pervez Musharraf, ought to be left alone—moreover, supported to the hilt—for all our sakes.
Tuesday, 6 November 2007
Democracy in Russia Stifled at Birth
Hi, A few more thoughts from my carer,
Ever since the 25th of July 1998 when the drunk Yel'tsin proposed the catastrophic nomination of Colonel Vladimir Putin as Director of the 75,000-person Federal Security Service (FSB), democracy in Russia has spiralled ever downwards towards totalitarianism. It’s no accident that a series of explosions occurred in Moscow throughout September only one year later, culminating in the Moscow apartment bombings, killing some 300 people. That eased the way into the second Chechen War, and more importantly, it initiated the grab for power and finance by the various members of the KGB such as Andrei Lugovoi, and his KGB cronies.
Quiet naturally this eventually culminated in Russia’s two most powerful Secret Police factions pursuing a turf war in a standoff between the FSB, the former KGB, headed by General Nikolai Patrushev, and the Federal Narcotics Control Service (FSKN), headed by General Viktor Cherkesov, which supposedly fights organised crime as well as drug trafficking. Both quiet rightly see each other as opposing gangs of Mafiosi grabbing what they can in this free-for-all. This is the reality of power in modern 21st Century space age Russia.
Ignoring the above, dogma wielding Bush Jnr. invited General Putin to his New England home to meet the family, but now preaches General Musharraf on democracy. Is this a conundrum I ask? Have I missed something salient? I must leave you, dear reader, to work that out.
We have General Putin attempting to regain control over his neighbours such as Belarus, Ukraine, and Georgia, while his underlings help themselves to the lolly in Russia. There is even a bizarre sick attempt to portray Russian soldiers occupying Georgia’s Abkhazia region as “peacekeepers.” Ask Moldova about Russian “peacekeepers,” there to keep a piece of Moldova but not the peace. The situation is far worse than it ever was ever since Stalin’s time. Not a single independent newspaper, radio, or TV station has survived General Putin’s regime.
Ever since the 25th of July 1998 when the drunk Yel'tsin proposed the catastrophic nomination of Colonel Vladimir Putin as Director of the 75,000-person Federal Security Service (FSB), democracy in Russia has spiralled ever downwards towards totalitarianism. It’s no accident that a series of explosions occurred in Moscow throughout September only one year later, culminating in the Moscow apartment bombings, killing some 300 people. That eased the way into the second Chechen War, and more importantly, it initiated the grab for power and finance by the various members of the KGB such as Andrei Lugovoi, and his KGB cronies.
Quiet naturally this eventually culminated in Russia’s two most powerful Secret Police factions pursuing a turf war in a standoff between the FSB, the former KGB, headed by General Nikolai Patrushev, and the Federal Narcotics Control Service (FSKN), headed by General Viktor Cherkesov, which supposedly fights organised crime as well as drug trafficking. Both quiet rightly see each other as opposing gangs of Mafiosi grabbing what they can in this free-for-all. This is the reality of power in modern 21st Century space age Russia.
Ignoring the above, dogma wielding Bush Jnr. invited General Putin to his New England home to meet the family, but now preaches General Musharraf on democracy. Is this a conundrum I ask? Have I missed something salient? I must leave you, dear reader, to work that out.
We have General Putin attempting to regain control over his neighbours such as Belarus, Ukraine, and Georgia, while his underlings help themselves to the lolly in Russia. There is even a bizarre sick attempt to portray Russian soldiers occupying Georgia’s Abkhazia region as “peacekeepers.” Ask Moldova about Russian “peacekeepers,” there to keep a piece of Moldova but not the peace. The situation is far worse than it ever was ever since Stalin’s time. Not a single independent newspaper, radio, or TV station has survived General Putin’s regime.
Labels:
Democracy is dead in Russia
Saturday, 3 November 2007
Death of a Worthless Brazilian
My carer warns—this may contain strong views.
There is something fundamentally wrong when Trotskyites and Conservatives both climb into bed with the Liberals—don’t you think? What on earth have they got in common? Well, it seems the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair. They all want to get rid of him. Left, right and centre of the political spectrum want to force Sir Ian Blair, the top policeman in Britain, to resign over a worthless illegal Brazilian worker—who has been deified by the media. Sometimes the media likes to throw its weight around, to display its raw power over others. Usually they pick a politician, but this time they chose Sir Ian Blair. He made the mistake of trying to manipulate them at his inaugural press conference, and the media can’t forgive that. It is THEY who manipulate, not get manipulated themselves. So, Jean Charles de Menezes, 27, a bricklayer’s son from Brazil living in the UK on forged papers, illegally—was shot in the traumatic aftermath of 7/7, when all the police were jittery. Since then, how many people have died illegally of gun shots in London? Died illegally on the roads from joy riders. One dead illegal immigrant—so what?
He even looks like a convict.
For that we should crucify the chief policeman in Britain over this worthless Brazilian. Has this society lost ALL perspective?
Where is the media outcry for the Muslim fascists tearing at the fabric of our society? WHY ARE THEY NOT HOUNDING THE ROTTEN IMAMS out of this country, LIVING here OFF THE SOCIAL SECURITY and FREE COUNCIL HOUSING? It is underestimated that we have allowed well in excess of 50,000 Muslim terrorists into this country since the collapse of the Taliban training camps—and our media, ever short-sighted in the pursuit of sensationalism, is trying to get the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair sacked, or force him to resign over some illegal Brazilian nobody. Not for the first time do I ask, in which society do the media live in? They live amongst us but DO NOT share any of our societies values. In nature these are called PARASITES. Something like Julian Manyon prancing about Lebanon, during the recent battle, giving a helping hand to Hezbollah terrorist families, reporting false staged ambulance attacks, trying to elicit viewer’s sympathy for a bunch of fascist Shia terrorists. He’s a British disgrace. The fabric of our Western society is being torn to shreds by these loathsome tactics—they could almost be called societal suicide.
There is something fundamentally wrong when Trotskyites and Conservatives both climb into bed with the Liberals—don’t you think? What on earth have they got in common? Well, it seems the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair. They all want to get rid of him. Left, right and centre of the political spectrum want to force Sir Ian Blair, the top policeman in Britain, to resign over a worthless illegal Brazilian worker—who has been deified by the media. Sometimes the media likes to throw its weight around, to display its raw power over others. Usually they pick a politician, but this time they chose Sir Ian Blair. He made the mistake of trying to manipulate them at his inaugural press conference, and the media can’t forgive that. It is THEY who manipulate, not get manipulated themselves. So, Jean Charles de Menezes, 27, a bricklayer’s son from Brazil living in the UK on forged papers, illegally—was shot in the traumatic aftermath of 7/7, when all the police were jittery. Since then, how many people have died illegally of gun shots in London? Died illegally on the roads from joy riders. One dead illegal immigrant—so what?
He even looks like a convict.
For that we should crucify the chief policeman in Britain over this worthless Brazilian. Has this society lost ALL perspective?
Where is the media outcry for the Muslim fascists tearing at the fabric of our society? WHY ARE THEY NOT HOUNDING THE ROTTEN IMAMS out of this country, LIVING here OFF THE SOCIAL SECURITY and FREE COUNCIL HOUSING? It is underestimated that we have allowed well in excess of 50,000 Muslim terrorists into this country since the collapse of the Taliban training camps—and our media, ever short-sighted in the pursuit of sensationalism, is trying to get the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair sacked, or force him to resign over some illegal Brazilian nobody. Not for the first time do I ask, in which society do the media live in? They live amongst us but DO NOT share any of our societies values. In nature these are called PARASITES. Something like Julian Manyon prancing about Lebanon, during the recent battle, giving a helping hand to Hezbollah terrorist families, reporting false staged ambulance attacks, trying to elicit viewer’s sympathy for a bunch of fascist Shia terrorists. He’s a British disgrace. The fabric of our Western society is being torn to shreds by these loathsome tactics—they could almost be called societal suicide.
Labels:
Societal Suicide
Thursday, 1 November 2007
Wednesday, 31 October 2007
Sierra Leone serial sex offender’s Human Rights? Yeh joking, right?
This is a story that really upset my carer. A serial sex offender, Mohammed Kendeh, 21, of Peckham, south London, who over the past five years has been arrested for robbery, burglary, arson, and drugs offences, was last year convicted of indecently assaulting 11 women. It seems Britain's top immigration judge and husband of Culture Minister Margaret Hodge, says he cannot be deported back to Sierra Leone. Why on earth not—you might rightly ask? Well, President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT), Mr Justice Sir Henry Hodge, claimed that Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, enshrines his “right to a family life,” thus ensuring that this dangerous sexual predator could not be deported, and so the judge upheld Kendeh's RIGHT TO STAY in Britain. What f-----g right?
This judge was a former chairman of the National Council for Civil Liberties (now known as Liberty), and has a long record of furthering human rights causes. So why is this cloud-cuckoo-land Liberty dogma judge the senior judge at AIT?
One of Kendeh's victims, Gabrielle Browne, 42, a mother of two, who was dragged into the bushes and sexually assaulted while running in a London park in 2003, has waived her right to anonymity to condemn the judgment. Mrs Browne, said, “I feel devastated and let down. How can it be that somebody who has offended so seriously against defenceless women is allowed to remain in this country? It is more than likely he will rape or kill a future victim. It’s a farce.” Well, not just a farce, but a Human Rights farce!
Who is at fault? Not Kendeh’s lawyers for invoking the Human Rights Act. I’m not even able to blame the judge for his ruling—since the law is there. Britain signed up for this rubbish. It’s clearly not in the interests of British Women that Mohammed Kendeh remains in this country. Unless Britain pulls out of this stupendously stupid Human Rights Convention, foreign criminals and other migrants will continue to utilise it cynically to circumvent BRITISH LAW.
The European Convention on Human Rights defines and guarantees, since 1950, human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. All 47 member states of the Council of Europe have signed this Convention and are therefore under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg—and it is perverting the Law of Europe.
If those in Europe abide by the law, then the Human Rights Convention should apply, but if the law of the land is transgressed, then there should be NO ability to hide behind the Human Rights Convention to avoid deportation. The number of deportations that have failed due to this Human Rights Convention is simply staggering.
The inhabitants of Britain have to put up with Muslim Fascist Imams and other foreign criminals because of this stupid Human Rights Convention. It’s the dogma argument all over again. Criminals are not dealt with on the basis of their transgression but on Human Rights dogma. Come on people—kick the MP’s where it hurts. Stop voting for dogma driven imbeciles.
This judge was a former chairman of the National Council for Civil Liberties (now known as Liberty), and has a long record of furthering human rights causes. So why is this cloud-cuckoo-land Liberty dogma judge the senior judge at AIT?
One of Kendeh's victims, Gabrielle Browne, 42, a mother of two, who was dragged into the bushes and sexually assaulted while running in a London park in 2003, has waived her right to anonymity to condemn the judgment. Mrs Browne, said, “I feel devastated and let down. How can it be that somebody who has offended so seriously against defenceless women is allowed to remain in this country? It is more than likely he will rape or kill a future victim. It’s a farce.” Well, not just a farce, but a Human Rights farce!
Who is at fault? Not Kendeh’s lawyers for invoking the Human Rights Act. I’m not even able to blame the judge for his ruling—since the law is there. Britain signed up for this rubbish. It’s clearly not in the interests of British Women that Mohammed Kendeh remains in this country. Unless Britain pulls out of this stupendously stupid Human Rights Convention, foreign criminals and other migrants will continue to utilise it cynically to circumvent BRITISH LAW.
The European Convention on Human Rights defines and guarantees, since 1950, human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. All 47 member states of the Council of Europe have signed this Convention and are therefore under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg—and it is perverting the Law of Europe.
If those in Europe abide by the law, then the Human Rights Convention should apply, but if the law of the land is transgressed, then there should be NO ability to hide behind the Human Rights Convention to avoid deportation. The number of deportations that have failed due to this Human Rights Convention is simply staggering.
The inhabitants of Britain have to put up with Muslim Fascist Imams and other foreign criminals because of this stupid Human Rights Convention. It’s the dogma argument all over again. Criminals are not dealt with on the basis of their transgression but on Human Rights dogma. Come on people—kick the MP’s where it hurts. Stop voting for dogma driven imbeciles.
Labels:
Crackpot British Justice
Friday, 26 October 2007
Space exploration…is it worth the cost?
As I watched my carer watching the live feed on his PC, I as a cat, had mixed feelings about this space thing. The live feed was coming from STS120 and the ISS on NASA TV and I heard my carer asking himself, “Why are we up there doing this? Why are we spending trillions on mastering space?
The answer that springs clearly to my mind is—human survival. We are following Darwin’s policy of “survival of the fittest” (Herbert Spencer used the phrase in his Principles of Biology of 1864 after reading Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species). However, I would like to put it another way—are humans fit to survive?
Humans live on a fragile planet called Earth, and our current climate problems underline this. We are only 10,000 years into this present Interglacial (Holocene), and we maybe have ten thousand more years to fully master space travel. Our previous climate changes make this mastery urgent. In order to make humanity independent of Earth we need to be able to survive independently of this fragile home. If anything should happen to endanger our home planet, then we should be in a position to exist in space and hopefully find another home on another planet. We take out Home Insurance on our homes—and so this is simply another form of planetary Home Insurance. This is our future safety—our nest egg—our reserve position for human survival. If the above proposition is plausible, then we are not spending enough on space exploration.” What can a mere cat add to that…I ask you?
The answer that springs clearly to my mind is—human survival. We are following Darwin’s policy of “survival of the fittest” (Herbert Spencer used the phrase in his Principles of Biology of 1864 after reading Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species). However, I would like to put it another way—are humans fit to survive?
Humans live on a fragile planet called Earth, and our current climate problems underline this. We are only 10,000 years into this present Interglacial (Holocene), and we maybe have ten thousand more years to fully master space travel. Our previous climate changes make this mastery urgent. In order to make humanity independent of Earth we need to be able to survive independently of this fragile home. If anything should happen to endanger our home planet, then we should be in a position to exist in space and hopefully find another home on another planet. We take out Home Insurance on our homes—and so this is simply another form of planetary Home Insurance. This is our future safety—our nest egg—our reserve position for human survival. If the above proposition is plausible, then we are not spending enough on space exploration.” What can a mere cat add to that…I ask you?
Labels:
Human Survival
Bad News and Good News!
If one takes Islam as a cultural meme and extends it, then due to its aggressive nature, it ought to succeed in the short term, especially against the present internally weakened Western cultural meme (by such asinine dogmas as Political Correctness and Human Rights), but because of Islam’s flawed religious base—it must fail as a meme in the long haul.
Labels:
Flawed Religion.
Wednesday, 24 October 2007
“UK Population to be 78.6 million by 2051”
Hi again. My carer read this in a news release given out by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). On current trends, the ONS now forecasts, “the numbers in Britain will grow to 62.8 million in 2011, 65 million in 2016, 67.2 million in 2021, 69.3 million in 2026 and 71.1 million in 2031, 78.6 million in 2051 and 85.3 million in 2081. That means that the UK's population is now rising by about 400,000 a year.”
My worry is this: WILL WE HAVE ENOUGH MOSQUES TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM. Should we get Blackpool and Manchester to abandon their supercasino schemes and switch to clearing the ground for a West Ham style supermosque instead? I’m sure Ken Livingstone would be only to happy to help with the funding. What do you think?
My worry is this: WILL WE HAVE ENOUGH MOSQUES TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM. Should we get Blackpool and Manchester to abandon their supercasino schemes and switch to clearing the ground for a West Ham style supermosque instead? I’m sure Ken Livingstone would be only to happy to help with the funding. What do you think?
Labels:
Muslim Invasion of Britain
Monday, 22 October 2007
Curse of all Ages——Dogma
Another rant by my carer on Dogma.
Trotskyites in bed with Islamic Fascists? What could possibly unite them? Could it be their extreme dogmas. That logically and pedantically they should be throttling each other seems to have escaped both sides.
+
= DOGMA
Terry Eagleton and Ken Livingstone both stand on the same Marxist platform, promoting Islam and decrying Islamophobia—a platform made in between Jahannum and Fardaus. One, a failed Catholic rationalising his way through life; the other a leftwing sycophant looking for succour from halfwits like Chavez. And what do we get from this platform: a godless form of sharia? Are Shahīd consequently offered prostitutes instead of virgins in their fantasy fardaus (paradise)? By the way, am I missing something? These Shahīds are suposedly dead--so what could they possibly do with a virgin?
How has it come about that the Left is so cosy with the Islamic Fascists? Well, the Trots are such a hopeless case that they seek alliances with every available minority—gays, Muslims, asylum seekers—all in the futile hope that the added numbers will somehow make them blossom into a substantive political force. Marxism died with the Soviets—and the Chinese billionairs are hardly Marxist. The trend away from the left has hit the Trots hard, and so now they’ve taken to supporting Muslim Fascists.
From my point I say a pox on all their houses. I would have sharpened the famous pickaxe to help Trotsky on his way; but then I would have done the same for Lenin, Stalin, or Mao. Lets not leave Hitler and Mussonlin out. Pickaxes for both of them. For the Pope and that loony Druidic Archbishop of Cantebury. Every major religion deseves to be dismatled. All dogma merchants of the worst degree. I’ve no intention of leaving out Adam Smith et al. Thoughtless capitalism is as ridden with dogma as is the anti-global campaigners. The more rabid the screaming and shouting the more I’m convinced that the loony bin is waiting for them.
Is mild dogma allowable then—well no! So PC and New Labour is also out, as is the conservatives with a small or capital C. Lets be fair and include the Lib Dems. and a pox on those Liberty libertarian people with their own form of dogma.
So what is the way forward? Has it never occurred to people that every situation is different and deserves a unique solution. Each problem needs to be solved without dogma, but based on the requirements and circumastances. Total Macro solutions are out. Micro solutions are in. Down with all dogma!
PS By 1991 Ramirez Sanchez, aka Carlos the Jackal, had converted from Trotskyism to radical Fascist Islam. One extreme crackpot dogma simply replaced by another. This is characteristic of a dysfunctional personality engrossed in a dysfunctional dogma.
Trotskyites in bed with Islamic Fascists? What could possibly unite them? Could it be their extreme dogmas. That logically and pedantically they should be throttling each other seems to have escaped both sides.
+
= DOGMA
Terry Eagleton and Ken Livingstone both stand on the same Marxist platform, promoting Islam and decrying Islamophobia—a platform made in between Jahannum and Fardaus. One, a failed Catholic rationalising his way through life; the other a leftwing sycophant looking for succour from halfwits like Chavez. And what do we get from this platform: a godless form of sharia? Are Shahīd consequently offered prostitutes instead of virgins in their fantasy fardaus (paradise)? By the way, am I missing something? These Shahīds are suposedly dead--so what could they possibly do with a virgin?
How has it come about that the Left is so cosy with the Islamic Fascists? Well, the Trots are such a hopeless case that they seek alliances with every available minority—gays, Muslims, asylum seekers—all in the futile hope that the added numbers will somehow make them blossom into a substantive political force. Marxism died with the Soviets—and the Chinese billionairs are hardly Marxist. The trend away from the left has hit the Trots hard, and so now they’ve taken to supporting Muslim Fascists.
From my point I say a pox on all their houses. I would have sharpened the famous pickaxe to help Trotsky on his way; but then I would have done the same for Lenin, Stalin, or Mao. Lets not leave Hitler and Mussonlin out. Pickaxes for both of them. For the Pope and that loony Druidic Archbishop of Cantebury. Every major religion deseves to be dismatled. All dogma merchants of the worst degree. I’ve no intention of leaving out Adam Smith et al. Thoughtless capitalism is as ridden with dogma as is the anti-global campaigners. The more rabid the screaming and shouting the more I’m convinced that the loony bin is waiting for them.
Is mild dogma allowable then—well no! So PC and New Labour is also out, as is the conservatives with a small or capital C. Lets be fair and include the Lib Dems. and a pox on those Liberty libertarian people with their own form of dogma.
So what is the way forward? Has it never occurred to people that every situation is different and deserves a unique solution. Each problem needs to be solved without dogma, but based on the requirements and circumastances. Total Macro solutions are out. Micro solutions are in. Down with all dogma!
PS By 1991 Ramirez Sanchez, aka Carlos the Jackal, had converted from Trotskyism to radical Fascist Islam. One extreme crackpot dogma simply replaced by another. This is characteristic of a dysfunctional personality engrossed in a dysfunctional dogma.
Sunday, 30 September 2007
A Chance for Ukrainian Democracy
Hi,
My carer felt strongly enough to explain to me that Putin’s KGB regime would love to see the Party of Regions(Russians) subvert today’s elections, as happened in Belarus, but thanks to President Viktor Yushchenko this looks unlikely. Putin’s puddle, PM Viktor Yanukovich, has packed the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) with his supporters but too many eyes are watching for them to repeat blatantly their shenanigans of yesteryear.
Ukrainian Democracy versus Party of Russians
Only a Yushchenko—Tymoshenko government, over the long term by joining the EU, will put a stop to Putin’s ambitions to intimidate the EU. The sham Russian “peacekeepers” in Abkhazia, Gerogia; the Russian Army in Dniester, Moldova, the recent KGB cyber attack on Estonia, are a sample of how Russia intends to behave. Support for Iran’s Ahemdinnerjacket, Chavez and any other loony dictator that applies, is only natural coming from a government that has its roots in the Lyubyanka. Russia simply cannot understand Democracy—or that people should be able to decide who governs them. Long Live the Orange Revolution!
My carer felt strongly enough to explain to me that Putin’s KGB regime would love to see the Party of Regions(Russians) subvert today’s elections, as happened in Belarus, but thanks to President Viktor Yushchenko this looks unlikely. Putin’s puddle, PM Viktor Yanukovich, has packed the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) with his supporters but too many eyes are watching for them to repeat blatantly their shenanigans of yesteryear.
Ukrainian Democracy versus Party of Russians
Only a Yushchenko—Tymoshenko government, over the long term by joining the EU, will put a stop to Putin’s ambitions to intimidate the EU. The sham Russian “peacekeepers” in Abkhazia, Gerogia; the Russian Army in Dniester, Moldova, the recent KGB cyber attack on Estonia, are a sample of how Russia intends to behave. Support for Iran’s Ahemdinnerjacket, Chavez and any other loony dictator that applies, is only natural coming from a government that has its roots in the Lyubyanka. Russia simply cannot understand Democracy—or that people should be able to decide who governs them. Long Live the Orange Revolution!
Labels:
Ukrainian Democracy
Saturday, 29 September 2007
Don’t Ahoy Me Matey!
Hi,
Well it’s the end of another boating season for a year—thank goodness. My carer tried to get me to come with him, but me and water don’t mix. You can just see me cringing at the bottom right of the picture.
Its bad enough when it falls on on my nice coat from somewhere above, without warning, but to ask me to jump on a flimsy noisy motor boat is just out of the question. I told him, no amount of coaxing is going to get me aboard your boat. He sighed—and put it down to my femenine stuborness.
Not on that mate!
Well it’s the end of another boating season for a year—thank goodness. My carer tried to get me to come with him, but me and water don’t mix. You can just see me cringing at the bottom right of the picture.
Its bad enough when it falls on on my nice coat from somewhere above, without warning, but to ask me to jump on a flimsy noisy motor boat is just out of the question. I told him, no amount of coaxing is going to get me aboard your boat. He sighed—and put it down to my femenine stuborness.
Not on that mate!
Labels:
Cats and Boats
Thursday, 27 September 2007
Who stole my NHS Dentist?
Hi,
My carer claims that the NHS Dental service was destroyed by Brown to save NHS money and force people to buy private dental treatment.
How did he do that?
By asking the dentists to sign up to an NHS Dental Contract, which he knew, they would refuse to sign. That supposedly puts the onus on the bad old Dentist—well NO!
Dentists earn around £100,000 per year—and the more you earn the more you want. Ask the dentist to sign up to a drop in income, and would YOU do it? I don’t think so. The Contract is the culprit—and so are those who devised it. Now—no one can find an NHS Dentist for love or money. We seem to be going backwards under this government, but I would venture to suggest the Tories would keep this one going if they got in. If I want dental treatment, I now have to pay privately for it or go without. Do I get a reduction in NI Contributions--certaily not!
May your teeth rot Mr Brown!
My carer claims that the NHS Dental service was destroyed by Brown to save NHS money and force people to buy private dental treatment.
How did he do that?
By asking the dentists to sign up to an NHS Dental Contract, which he knew, they would refuse to sign. That supposedly puts the onus on the bad old Dentist—well NO!
Dentists earn around £100,000 per year—and the more you earn the more you want. Ask the dentist to sign up to a drop in income, and would YOU do it? I don’t think so. The Contract is the culprit—and so are those who devised it. Now—no one can find an NHS Dentist for love or money. We seem to be going backwards under this government, but I would venture to suggest the Tories would keep this one going if they got in. If I want dental treatment, I now have to pay privately for it or go without. Do I get a reduction in NI Contributions--certaily not!
May your teeth rot Mr Brown!
Labels:
NHS Dentist?
Wednesday, 26 September 2007
Brown; “Heir to Thatcher”
Hi,
My carer was flabbergasted by Lord Tebbit’s carefully leaked outburst to The Times.
The former Tory Chairman Lord Tebbit, in an interview with The Times to be published this weekend, praises Gordon Brown for his "principled conduct," and suggests he was the real “heir” to Margaret Thatcher.
It more or less vindicates my yesterday’s posting (see New Government—New Slogans—Old Policies).
The media are full of Lord Tebbit putting in the boot to David Cameron for rejecting Thatcher’s failed legacy. One of Tebbit’s gripes is that Cameron and his clique are too intellectual—since when was that a bad thing? Tells us where Tebbit’s coming from, doesn’t it? Thatcher was certainly NO intellectual—harping on about "Victorian Values," and such nonsense, as a way forward for our society.
The cynicism of politicians has sunk to a new low when we have Gordon Brown being hailed as the natural heir to Margaret Thatcher by Tebbit, of all people, and Tebbit went on to praise Mr Brown, saying, "I think he is a clever man and I have very considerable regard for him." One autocratic lowbrow pouring praise on another autocrat who fancies himself as “Thatcher’s heir,” having invited her in for “tea” and a consultation to 10 Downing Street. It looks to me like the parties ought to swap names and stop playing insulting games with the electorate.
My carer was flabbergasted by Lord Tebbit’s carefully leaked outburst to The Times.
The former Tory Chairman Lord Tebbit, in an interview with The Times to be published this weekend, praises Gordon Brown for his "principled conduct," and suggests he was the real “heir” to Margaret Thatcher.
It more or less vindicates my yesterday’s posting (see New Government—New Slogans—Old Policies).
The media are full of Lord Tebbit putting in the boot to David Cameron for rejecting Thatcher’s failed legacy. One of Tebbit’s gripes is that Cameron and his clique are too intellectual—since when was that a bad thing? Tells us where Tebbit’s coming from, doesn’t it? Thatcher was certainly NO intellectual—harping on about "Victorian Values," and such nonsense, as a way forward for our society.
The cynicism of politicians has sunk to a new low when we have Gordon Brown being hailed as the natural heir to Margaret Thatcher by Tebbit, of all people, and Tebbit went on to praise Mr Brown, saying, "I think he is a clever man and I have very considerable regard for him." One autocratic lowbrow pouring praise on another autocrat who fancies himself as “Thatcher’s heir,” having invited her in for “tea” and a consultation to 10 Downing Street. It looks to me like the parties ought to swap names and stop playing insulting games with the electorate.
Labels:
Brown: "Heir to Thatcher"
Tuesday, 25 September 2007
New Government—New Slogans—Old Policies
Hi,
My carer hates dogma, whether leftwing, rightwing, liberal, or religious, so I got a little worried as I watched him frown at the conference news coming from Bournemouth, until he finally couldn’t contain himself and burst out:
New promises on Law and Order, on Education, Housing, the Environment, NHS, and Europe—as if this was a NEW government, rather than one that’s been in power for over TEN years. Brown has been at the heart of that government for over ten years—yet now he pretends he’s only just come to power. We, the electorate, are complete idiots—at least Brown hopes we are.
“I will stand up for British values” as Brown interprets them (reminiscences of Thatcher):— of multiculturalism, lax immigration, and stolen conservative policies—an idea plucked straight from the Clinton years.
Brown promises a crackdown on crime (having promoted an over-bureaucratized police), drugs (now more easily available than at any other time), and binge drinking (encouraged by Chancellor Brown with lax licensing laws), and a return to Brown’s version of British values. "I will stand up for British values. I will stand up for a strong Britain. And I will always stand up for you." Mr Brown also wrapped himself in the flag, referring to “Britain” or “Britishness” 80 times in his speech, as if saying “Britain” would appeal to the right. Maybe a slogan too far?
Brown is a secretive, autocratic, and full of hot-air promises politician, packaging cheap phrases into easy sound-bites. Slogan after slogan trips easily from Brown’s tongue since he relies on people having a short attention span.
Where is my NHS Dentist Mr Brown? What happened to my Pension? Why can’t ‘A’ Level students spell, and are poor at maths? Why are we short of housing, Mr Brown? Why are criminals laughing at Law and Order? Why is Britain supporting an Asian Muslim country for EU membership? As for the Environment, when is your Government, Mr Brown, going to tell the Automobile Industry where to get off?
My carer hates dogma, whether leftwing, rightwing, liberal, or religious, so I got a little worried as I watched him frown at the conference news coming from Bournemouth, until he finally couldn’t contain himself and burst out:
New promises on Law and Order, on Education, Housing, the Environment, NHS, and Europe—as if this was a NEW government, rather than one that’s been in power for over TEN years. Brown has been at the heart of that government for over ten years—yet now he pretends he’s only just come to power. We, the electorate, are complete idiots—at least Brown hopes we are.
“I will stand up for British values” as Brown interprets them (reminiscences of Thatcher):— of multiculturalism, lax immigration, and stolen conservative policies—an idea plucked straight from the Clinton years.
Brown promises a crackdown on crime (having promoted an over-bureaucratized police), drugs (now more easily available than at any other time), and binge drinking (encouraged by Chancellor Brown with lax licensing laws), and a return to Brown’s version of British values. "I will stand up for British values. I will stand up for a strong Britain. And I will always stand up for you." Mr Brown also wrapped himself in the flag, referring to “Britain” or “Britishness” 80 times in his speech, as if saying “Britain” would appeal to the right. Maybe a slogan too far?
Brown is a secretive, autocratic, and full of hot-air promises politician, packaging cheap phrases into easy sound-bites. Slogan after slogan trips easily from Brown’s tongue since he relies on people having a short attention span.
Where is my NHS Dentist Mr Brown? What happened to my Pension? Why can’t ‘A’ Level students spell, and are poor at maths? Why are we short of housing, Mr Brown? Why are criminals laughing at Law and Order? Why is Britain supporting an Asian Muslim country for EU membership? As for the Environment, when is your Government, Mr Brown, going to tell the Automobile Industry where to get off?
Labels:
Gordon Brown Bournemouth Speech
Sunday, 23 September 2007
Spin-man Gordon Brown
Hi again,
I sat and listened to my carer as he carefully explained this story to me: see what you think—although what a humble but pretty cat like me can do about this I’m sure I don’t know.
The Blair/Brown spin-doctors may have felt in 2005 that it was a brilliant sound bite for their G8 and EU Presidency, “Make Poverty History,” but when applied to Africa the corrupt African leaders simply saw it as another opportunity to filch more handouts, being thrown at them by a bunch of cynical British politicians, looking to grab attention for themselves in headlines.
However the reality is somewhat different; one quarter of the GDP of African States – or $148 billion—is lost to corruption each year. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said recently (see link) at the inauguration of the Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative, “Corruption undermines democracy and the rule of law. It leads to violations of human rights. It erodes public trust in government. It can even kill – for example, when corrupt officials allow medicines to be tampered with, or when they accept bribes that enable terrorist acts to take place.”
When the campaign to forgive African debt, promoted by NGO’s with their own agendas and well meaning but naive leftwing pressure groups, is put forward, maybe they should factor in the tragic example of former Nigerian President Sani Abacha, members of his family and accomplices who collectively stole between $3 billion and $5 billion of the country’s public assets in five years. Or the recent case of the Kenyan Parliament which voted to quash all corruption enquiries.
Cynical donors, such as Brown and Blair, have poured more than $300 billion into African coffers since 1980—and watched most of it vanish into the pockets of leaders bent on fraud, malfeasance and waste. Nevertheless, Prime Minister Gordon Brown wants to double global aid to Africa to $50 billion a year by 2010. Clearly someone more at home with spin, than with the reality of the situation. The slogan, “No MORE Handouts to Africa,” might be more appropriate.
I sat and listened to my carer as he carefully explained this story to me: see what you think—although what a humble but pretty cat like me can do about this I’m sure I don’t know.
The Blair/Brown spin-doctors may have felt in 2005 that it was a brilliant sound bite for their G8 and EU Presidency, “Make Poverty History,” but when applied to Africa the corrupt African leaders simply saw it as another opportunity to filch more handouts, being thrown at them by a bunch of cynical British politicians, looking to grab attention for themselves in headlines.
However the reality is somewhat different; one quarter of the GDP of African States – or $148 billion—is lost to corruption each year. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said recently (see link) at the inauguration of the Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative, “Corruption undermines democracy and the rule of law. It leads to violations of human rights. It erodes public trust in government. It can even kill – for example, when corrupt officials allow medicines to be tampered with, or when they accept bribes that enable terrorist acts to take place.”
When the campaign to forgive African debt, promoted by NGO’s with their own agendas and well meaning but naive leftwing pressure groups, is put forward, maybe they should factor in the tragic example of former Nigerian President Sani Abacha, members of his family and accomplices who collectively stole between $3 billion and $5 billion of the country’s public assets in five years. Or the recent case of the Kenyan Parliament which voted to quash all corruption enquiries.
Cynical donors, such as Brown and Blair, have poured more than $300 billion into African coffers since 1980—and watched most of it vanish into the pockets of leaders bent on fraud, malfeasance and waste. Nevertheless, Prime Minister Gordon Brown wants to double global aid to Africa to $50 billion a year by 2010. Clearly someone more at home with spin, than with the reality of the situation. The slogan, “No MORE Handouts to Africa,” might be more appropriate.
Labels:
African Corruption
Saturday, 22 September 2007
DAB Ripoff
Hi Again,
My carer keeps on about the DAB ripoff going on out there by the electronic retailers—and I wouldn’t care, but it makes him so angry that the vibes rub off on me. He claims that any receiver is simply a matter of tuning in to the right frequency with a cheap tuner, so there should be little or NO difference in price between an analogue radio or a digital radio. So why, he rants, is there such a price disparity?
The DAB ripoff by Britain’s retailers is caused by greed and customer ignorance, since there is no difference between analogue and digital apart from the tuner being tuned from
FM = 88-108 MHz or 3.4m-2.8m to
DAB = 175-230 MHz or 1.7m-1.3m
so why does a cheap and nasty plastic Chinese DAB personal radio worth no more than £2 or £3 cost £80 in the shops instead of a max of £20—which still allows the retailers to make a very healthy profit? Is it simply because retailers think customers are suckers. Everybody is very quiet about this and I’m trying to talk him out of starting an online protest petition.
My carer keeps on about the DAB ripoff going on out there by the electronic retailers—and I wouldn’t care, but it makes him so angry that the vibes rub off on me. He claims that any receiver is simply a matter of tuning in to the right frequency with a cheap tuner, so there should be little or NO difference in price between an analogue radio or a digital radio. So why, he rants, is there such a price disparity?
The DAB ripoff by Britain’s retailers is caused by greed and customer ignorance, since there is no difference between analogue and digital apart from the tuner being tuned from
FM = 88-108 MHz or 3.4m-2.8m to
DAB = 175-230 MHz or 1.7m-1.3m
so why does a cheap and nasty plastic Chinese DAB personal radio worth no more than £2 or £3 cost £80 in the shops instead of a max of £20—which still allows the retailers to make a very healthy profit? Is it simply because retailers think customers are suckers. Everybody is very quiet about this and I’m trying to talk him out of starting an online protest petition.
Labels:
DAB Radio Ripoff
Friday, 21 September 2007
Carbon Footprint
Hi,
My friend next door suggested I start a blog, so here goes.
I want to start by talking about the perfidity of politicians. We tend to get a lot of rubbish about “carbon footprint” and “climate change” and both the government and media have targeted the individual householders, including my carer. When we had an Ozone hole problem the governments didn’t target the householders, the governments got together in Canada and told the CFC industry to stop producing Fridges by 5 years and aerosols by two years. In the same analogy the governments should now get together and tell the Automobile Industry to switch to hybrids within the next ten years and hydrogen thereafter. That will cure the pollution problem completely. Problem solved—well NO! As we saw with Kyoto, the governments refuse to get tough with the Power generators, the Automobile industry, and the Oil companies. Being soft on the Automobile Industry as a direct result of their heavy-handed lobbying. So instead they pick on the poor householder and my carer, who really has no influence—but if the government, egging on the media, shout at the householder about “carbon footprint” it SEEMS as if they’re doing something. I say, pick on someone your own size, like the Automobile Industry.
My friend next door suggested I start a blog, so here goes.
I want to start by talking about the perfidity of politicians. We tend to get a lot of rubbish about “carbon footprint” and “climate change” and both the government and media have targeted the individual householders, including my carer. When we had an Ozone hole problem the governments didn’t target the householders, the governments got together in Canada and told the CFC industry to stop producing Fridges by 5 years and aerosols by two years. In the same analogy the governments should now get together and tell the Automobile Industry to switch to hybrids within the next ten years and hydrogen thereafter. That will cure the pollution problem completely. Problem solved—well NO! As we saw with Kyoto, the governments refuse to get tough with the Power generators, the Automobile industry, and the Oil companies. Being soft on the Automobile Industry as a direct result of their heavy-handed lobbying. So instead they pick on the poor householder and my carer, who really has no influence—but if the government, egging on the media, shout at the householder about “carbon footprint” it SEEMS as if they’re doing something. I say, pick on someone your own size, like the Automobile Industry.
Labels:
Carbon Footprint Scam
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Counter
All contents of The Cat Talks copyright © 2007 The Cat Talks. unless otherwise noted.
All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. That's our story and we're sticking to it.
All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. That's our story and we're sticking to it.