Sunday, 22 August 2010


In 2009 a group of British doctors—including Michael Powers, a physician, barrister, and former coroner; and Julian Blon, a Professor of intensive care medicine argued that the ulnar artery is small and difficult to access, and severing it would NOT have triggered sufficient blood loss to cause death, particularly when outside in the cold (where vasoconstriction would cause slow blood loss). Moreover, the minimal amount of blood found at the scene suggested blood loss was not the cause of death. This challenged Lord Hutton's official verdict, arguing that the cause of Kelly’s death was untenable and unproven.


Dave Bartlett and Vanessa Hunt, the two paramedics who were called to the scene of Kelly's death, have since gone public with their that there was not enough blood at the scene of his death to justify the belief that he died from blood loss. Bartlett and Hunt were adamant that they saw a small amount of blood on plants near Kelly's body and a patch of blood the size of a coin on his trousers. They said they would expect to find several pints of blood at the scene of a suicide involving an arterial cut.


The same group of eminent doctors also contended that the amount of co-proxamol found in Dr Kelly (29 tablets) was only about a third of what would normally be fatal.


  • Finally, the most sinister finding of all: On 15 October 2007, it was discovered, through a Freedom of Information request, that the knife with which Kelly committed suicide had no fingerprints on it.


After Dr Kelly’s death, his computer hard drive had been wiped remotely. Nothing of Kelly’s work should have been classified. For it to have been outwardly convincing, it should all have been transparent—but then one can’t manipulate transparent findings, can one?


Instead of allowing an inquest to proceed by the Oxfordshire Coroner, Nicholas Gardiner, as would be usual, Tony Blair's government set up the obfuscational Hutton Inquiry, a public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death, so that the findings could be controlled by Blair’s corrupt government.


In January 2010, Lord Hutton controversially ordered that all files and evidence relating to the post-mortem, including the post-mortem report and photographs of the body, remain secret for 70 years. Baron Hutton, of Bresagh in the County of Downwhat have you got to hide?


In July 2010 a former KGB agent Boris Karpichkov said he was told by Intelligence contacts that Kelly had been "exterminated" and his death made to look like suicide.


During the Hutton inquiry, the British ambassador to the conference on disarmament in Geneva, David Broucher, reported a conversation with Dr Kelly at a Geneva meeting in February 2003. Broucher related that Kelly said he had assured his Iraqi sources that there would be no war if they co-operated, and that a war would put him in an "ambiguous" moral position. Broucher had asked Kelly what would happen if Iraq were invaded, and Kelly had replied, "I will probably be found dead in the woods."


Dr Kelly’s self-prophesy should be in the realm of outlandish fiction; unfortunately someone has chosen to translate them into fact—contrary to the usually accepted norms of ethics and morality. That person or persons unknown should be held to account!

Cynical Dysfunctional UK Policy

Britain’s politics seems to be aimed at destroying all of British indigenous culture. Brown encouraged Muslim immigrants so they could vote and keep a Labour government permanently in power (and failed)—now Cameron is helping the US to undermine the EU by extending EU borders to Iraq and Iran by supporting Turkey’s EU application.

Turkey is NOT European, has NO links to Europe’s culture, and is NOT in Europe—so why the hell would Europeans invite these Asiatic invaders into Europe. Its irrational but yet follows the self-destructive ‘Internationalist Principle.’

One can see why the US would want to destabilise a strong Europe where a Euro currency outperforms the dollar at every level, and a EU population and economy is twice the size of the US. But why would a conservative PM help to destroy the EU by encouraging 72 million extra Muslims to join the EU? The US seems to be saddled with a crackpot Republican Palin while the UK is now led by a Muslim defending wet conservative PM and whose installed a Muslim as Conservative Party Chairperson. I’d like to blame this lunacy on the Liberals, but I fear it is all Cameron’s own work—influenced no doubt by his bosom-pal, Turkish loving Boris Johnson. WHERE ARE THE CONSERVATIVE DEFENDERS OF BRITAIN? Seemingly only the BNP is aware of the danger to Britain, and they are unelectable.

What it boils down to—is that Britain in 50 years will have Sharia law instead of British law and be a member of an Islamic Europe, if the Muslim birth figures are any indicator. All thanks to wet permissive thinking that is now ubiquitous throughout Europe and the US.

Crap Political Correctness, Misguided Human Rights, Pernicious Soft Lefty policies followed even by the conservatives, leading to an eventual demise of European culture. The devious mendacious Muslims are playing the dogma ridden Europeans for very high stakes—and seemingly winning. RIP to EU.
All contents of The Cat Talks copyright © 2007 The Cat Talks. unless otherwise noted.
All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. That's our story and we're sticking to it.