Sierra Leone serial sex offender’s Human Rights? Yeh joking, right?

This is a story that really upset my carer. A serial sex offender, Mohammed Kendeh, 21, of Peckham, south London, who over the past five years has been arrested for robbery, burglary, arson, and drugs offences, was last year convicted of indecently assaulting 11 women. It seems Britain's top immigration judge and husband of Culture Minister Margaret Hodge, says he cannot be deported back to Sierra Leone. Why on earth not—you might rightly ask? Well, President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT), Mr Justice Sir Henry Hodge, claimed that Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, enshrines his “right to a family life,” thus ensuring that this dangerous sexual predator could not be deported, and so the judge upheld Kendeh's RIGHT TO STAY in Britain. What f-----g right?


This judge was a former chairman of the National Council for Civil Liberties (now known as Liberty), and has a long record of furthering human rights causes. So why is this cloud-cuckoo-land Liberty dogma judge the senior judge at AIT?

One of Kendeh's victims, Gabrielle Browne, 42, a mother of two, who was dragged into the bushes and sexually assaulted while running in a London park in 2003, has waived her right to anonymity to condemn the judgment. Mrs Browne, said, “I feel devastated and let down. How can it be that somebody who has offended so seriously against defenceless women is allowed to remain in this country? It is more than likely he will rape or kill a future victim. It’s a farce.” Well, not just a farce, but a Human Rights farce!

Who is at fault? Not Kendeh’s lawyers for invoking the Human Rights Act. I’m not even able to blame the judge for his ruling—since the law is there. Britain signed up for this rubbish. It’s clearly not in the interests of British Women that Mohammed Kendeh remains in this country. Unless Britain pulls out of this stupendously stupid Human Rights Convention, foreign criminals and other migrants will continue to utilise it cynically to circumvent BRITISH LAW.

The European Convention on Human Rights defines and guarantees, since 1950, human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. All 47 member states of the Council of Europe have signed this Convention and are therefore under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg—and it is perverting the Law of Europe.

If those in Europe abide by the law, then the Human Rights Convention should apply, but if the law of the land is transgressed, then there should be NO ability to hide behind the Human Rights Convention to avoid deportation. The number of deportations that have failed due to this Human Rights Convention is simply staggering.

The inhabitants of Britain have to put up with Muslim Fascist Imams and other foreign criminals because of this stupid Human Rights Convention. It’s the dogma argument all over again. Criminals are not dealt with on the basis of their transgression but on Human Rights dogma. Come on people—kick the MP’s where it hurts. Stop voting for dogma driven imbeciles.

Space exploration…is it worth the cost?

As I watched my carer watching the live feed on his PC, I as a cat, had mixed feelings about this space thing. The live feed was coming from STS120 and the ISS on NASA TV and I heard my carer asking himself, “Why are we up there doing this? Why are we spending trillions on mastering space?


The answer that springs clearly to my mind is—human survival. We are following Darwin’s policy of “survival of the fittest” (Herbert Spencer used the phrase in his Principles of Biology of 1864 after reading Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species). However, I would like to put it another way—are humans fit to survive?

Humans live on a fragile planet called Earth, and our current climate problems underline this. We are only 10,000 years into this present Interglacial (Holocene), and we maybe have ten thousand more years to fully master space travel. Our previous climate changes make this mastery urgent. In order to make humanity independent of Earth we need to be able to survive independently of this fragile home. If anything should happen to endanger our home planet, then we should be in a position to exist in space and hopefully find another home on another planet. We take out Home Insurance on our homes—and so this is simply another form of planetary Home Insurance. This is our future safety—our nest egg—our reserve position for human survival. If the above proposition is plausible, then we are not spending enough on space exploration.” What can a mere cat add to that…I ask you?

Bad News and Good News!

If one takes Islam as a cultural meme and extends it, then due to its aggressive nature, it ought to succeed in the short term, especially against the present internally weakened Western cultural meme (by such asinine dogmas as Political Correctness and Human Rights), but because of Islam’s flawed religious base—it must fail as a meme in the long haul.

“UK Population to be 78.6 million by 2051”

Hi again. My carer read this in a news release given out by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). On current trends, the ONS now forecasts, “the numbers in Britain will grow to 62.8 million in 2011, 65 million in 2016, 67.2 million in 2021, 69.3 million in 2026 and 71.1 million in 2031, 78.6 million in 2051 and 85.3 million in 2081. That means that the UK's population is now rising by about 400,000 a year.”


My worry is this: WILL WE HAVE ENOUGH MOSQUES TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM. Should we get Blackpool and Manchester to abandon their supercasino schemes and switch to clearing the ground for a West Ham style supermosque instead? I’m sure Ken Livingstone would be only to happy to help with the funding. What do you think?

Curse of all Ages——Dogma

Another rant by my carer on Dogma.

Trotskyites in bed with Islamic Fascists? What could possibly unite them? Could it be their extreme dogmas. That logically and pedantically they should be throttling each other seems to have escaped both sides.

+
= DOGMA






Terry Eagleton and Ken Livingstone both stand on the same Marxist platform, promoting Islam and decrying Islamophobia—a platform made in between Jahannum and Fardaus. One, a failed Catholic rationalising his way through life; the other a leftwing sycophant looking for succour from halfwits like Chavez. And what do we get from this platform: a godless form of sharia? Are Shahīd consequently offered prostitutes instead of virgins in their fantasy fardaus (paradise)? By the way, am I missing something? These Shahīds are suposedly dead--so what could they possibly do with a virgin?

How has it come about that the Left is so cosy with the Islamic Fascists? Well, the Trots are such a hopeless case that they seek alliances with every available minority—gays, Muslims, asylum seekers—all in the futile hope that the added numbers will somehow make them blossom into a substantive political force. Marxism died with the Soviets—and the Chinese billionairs are hardly Marxist. The trend away from the left has hit the Trots hard, and so now they’ve taken to supporting Muslim Fascists.

From my point I say a pox on all their houses. I would have sharpened the famous pickaxe to help Trotsky on his way; but then I would have done the same for Lenin, Stalin, or Mao. Lets not leave Hitler and Mussonlin out. Pickaxes for both of them. For the Pope and that loony Druidic Archbishop of Cantebury. Every major religion deseves to be dismatled. All dogma merchants of the worst degree. I’ve no intention of leaving out Adam Smith et al. Thoughtless capitalism is as ridden with dogma as is the anti-global campaigners. The more rabid the screaming and shouting the more I’m convinced that the loony bin is waiting for them.
Is mild dogma allowable then—well no! So PC and New Labour is also out, as is the conservatives with a small or capital C. Lets be fair and include the Lib Dems. and a pox on those Liberty libertarian people with their own form of dogma.

So what is the way forward? Has it never occurred to people that every situation is different and deserves a unique solution. Each problem needs to be solved without dogma, but based on the requirements and circumastances. Total Macro solutions are out. Micro solutions are in. Down with all dogma!

PS By 1991 Ramirez Sanchez, aka Carlos the Jackal, had converted from Trotskyism to radical Fascist Islam. One extreme crackpot dogma simply replaced by another. This is characteristic of a dysfunctional personality engrossed in a dysfunctional dogma.